Publicación:
Técnicas para estimar la estabilidad de una escala de medición en salud.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSimancas Pallares, Miguel Ángelspa
dc.contributor.authorHerazo, Edwinspa
dc.contributor.authorCampo Arias, Adalbertospa
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2016-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/rcb-2016-2936
dc.identifier.eissn2389-7252
dc.identifier.issn2215-7840
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/rcb-2016-2936
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/download/2936/2471
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2016spa
dc.relation.citationendpage111
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage104
dc.relation.citationvolume7spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ciencias Biomédicasspa
dc.relation.referencesGómez C, Ospina MB. Desarrollo de cuestionarios, adaptación y validación de escalas. En: Ruiz A, Morillo LE. Epidemiología clínica. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2004. p. 163-180.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez R, Echeverry J. Validación de escalas de medición en salud. Rev Salud Pública. 2004; 6: 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642004000300006spa
dc.relation.referencesCepeda MS, Pérez A. Estudios de concordancia. En: Ruiz A, Morillo LE. Epidemiología clínica. Bogotá: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2004. p. 293-307.spa
dc.relation.referencesGliner JA, Morgan GA, Harmon RJ. Measurement reliability. Journal of the American Academic of Child & and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001; 40: 486-488. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200104000-00019spa
dc.relation.referencesAdcock R, Collier D. Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Association. 2001; 95: 529-546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan GA, Gliner JA, Harmon RJ. Measurement validity. Journal of the American Academic of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001; 40: 729-731. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200106000-00019spa
dc.relation.referencesKaplan RM, Saccuzzo DP. Pruebas psicológicas. Sexta edición. México: Thompson; 2006. p. 132-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamprea JA, Gómez-Restrepo C. Validez en la evaluación escalas. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2007; 36: 340-348.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez MA, Lopera J. Conceptos básicos en la validación de escalas en salud mental. Rev CES Med. 2002; 16 (2): 31-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts P, Priest H, Traynor M. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard. 2006; 20: 41-45. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.20.36.41.s58spa
dc.relation.referencesCronbach J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDonald RP. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970; 23: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993; 78: 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98spa
dc.relation.referencesStreiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess. 2003; 80: 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01spa
dc.relation.referencesCampo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Rev Salud Publica. 2008; 10: 831-839. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642008000500015spa
dc.relation.referencesHulley SB, Cummings SR. Planning the measurement: precision and accuracy. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR. Designing clinical research. An epidemiologic approach. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 31-41.spa
dc.relation.referencesCervantes VH. Interpretaciones del coeficiente de alpha de Cronbach. Avances en medición. 2005; 3: 9-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesOviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2005; 34: 572-580.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlacker D, Endicott J. Psychometric properties: concepts of reliability and validity. In: Rush AJ, Pincus HA, First MB, Zarin DA, Blacker D, Endicott J, et al. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2002 (CD-ROM).spa
dc.relation.referencesCampo-Arias A, Herazo E. Concordancia intrae interobservador. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2010; 39: 424-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60261-4spa
dc.relation.referencesStrickland OL. Impact of unreliability of measurements on statistical conclusion validity. J Nurs Meas. 2005; 13: 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.2005.13.2.83spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez R, Gómez C. Conceptos básicos sobre validación de escalas. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 1998; 27: 121-130.spa
dc.relation.referencesStudent. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika. 1908; 6: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331554spa
dc.relation.referencesPearson K. Determination of the coefficient of correlation. Science. 1909; 30: 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.30.757.23spa
dc.relation.referencesShrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420spa
dc.relation.referencesLin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989; 45: 255-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051spa
dc.relation.referencesBland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8spa
dc.relation.referencesCepeda MS, Pérez A. Estudios de concordancia. Métodos para determinar la intercambiabilidad entre diferentes sistemas de medición en la práctica clínica. En: Ruiz A, Gómez C, Londoño D. Investigación clínica: Epidemiología clínica aplicada. Bogotá: Centro Editorial Javeriano, CEJA; 2001. p. 287-301.spa
dc.relation.referencesYen M, Lo LH. Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach. Nurs Res. 2002; 51: 59-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200201000-00009spa
dc.relation.referencesRasch D, Kubinger KD, Moder K. The two-sample t test: pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off. Statist Paper. 2011; 52: 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0224-xspa
dc.relation.referencesO'Neil ME, Mathews KL. Levene tests of homogeneity of variance for general block and treatment designs. Biometrics. 2002; 58: 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00216.xspa
dc.relation.referencesKatz MH. Study design and statistical analysis. A practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 79-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesPagano RR. Estadística para las ciencias del comportamiento. 7a edición. México: Thompson; 2006. p. 339.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman GR, Streiner DL. Bioestadística. Madrid: Mosby/Doyma libros; 1996. p. 171-172.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoe R, Meriño C. Magnitud del efecto: Una guía para investigadores y usuarios. Rev Psicol. 2003; 21: 147-177. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.200301.006spa
dc.relation.referencesLedesma R, MacBeth G, Cortada N. Tamaño del efecto: Revisión teórica y aplicaciones con el sistema estadístico ViSta. Rev Latinoam Psicol. 2008; 40: 425-439.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurlak JA. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004spa
dc.relation.referencesBland JM, Altman DG. Validating scales and indexes. Br Med J 2002; 324: 606-607. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.606spa
dc.relation.referencesKatz MH. Multivariable analysis. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesCortés E, Rubio J, Gaitán H. Métodos estadísticos de evaluación de la concordancia y reproducibilidad de pruebas diagnósticas. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2010; 61: 247-255. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.271spa
dc.relation.referencesSpearman C. Correlation calculated from faulty data. Br J Psychol. 1910; 3: 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.xspa
dc.relation.referencesLin L I-K. Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 1992; 48: 599-604. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532314spa
dc.relation.referencesCosta-Santos C, Antunes L, Souto A, Bernades J. Assessment of disagreement: A new information-based approach. An Epidemiol. 2010; 20: 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.011spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrasco JL, Jover L. Métodos estadísticos para evaluar la concordancia. Med Clin. (Barc) 2004; 122 (supl. 1): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1157/13057543spa
dc.relation.referencesCamacho-Sandoval J. Coeficiente de concordancia para variable es continuas. Acta Med Costarric. 2008; 50: 211-212. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v52i6.5spa
dc.relation.referencesWatson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology. Theriogenology. 2010; 73: 1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDewé W. Review of statistical methodologies used to compare (bio)assays. J Chromatog. 2009; 877: 2208-2213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.027spa
dc.relation.referencesKhawaja IS, Olson EJ, van der Walt C, Bukartyk J, Somers V, Dierkhising R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of split-night polysomnograms. J Clin Sleep Med. 2010; 6: 357-362. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.27877spa
dc.relation.referencesBland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995; 346: 1085-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9spa
dc.relation.referencesBland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204spa
dc.relation.referencesHopkins WG. Bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience. 2004; 8: 42-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanneman SK. Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies. Adv Crit Care. 2008; 19: 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3spa
dc.relation.referencesMyles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures (editorial). Br J Anest. 2007; 99: 309-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem214spa
dc.relation.referencesMantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J. Comparing method of clinical measurement: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90: 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200003000-00018spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt ME, Steindorf K. Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires. Methods Inf Med. 2006; 45: 409-413. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634096spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrera M. Diferencias estadísticamente significativas vs. relevancia clínica. Rev CES Med. 2008; 22: 89-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamacho PA, Rueda-Jaimes GE, Latorre JF, Navarro-Mancilla ÁA, Escobar M, Franco JA. Validez y confiabilidad de la escala del Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression en estudiantes adolescentes de Colombia. Biomédica. 2009; 29: 260-269. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v29i2.28spa
dc.relation.referencesMuñiz J. Medición de lo psicológico. Psicothema. 1998; 10: 1-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorras V, Lafaurie GI. Evaluación crítica de riesgo. Aplicación de la medicina basada en la evidencia. Validez interna. Análisis del método. Parte I. Validación de encuestas de riesgo. Rev Cient. 2004; 10: 68-72.spa
dc.relation.referencesCook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 166.e7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036spa
dc.relation.referencesAlarcón AM, Muñoz S. Medición en salud: Algunas consideraciones metodológicas. Rev Med Chile. 2008; 136: 125-130. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872008000100016spa
dc.relation.referencesPasquali L. Psychometrics. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009; 43: 992-999. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002spa
dc.rightsRevista Ciencias Biomédicas - 2016spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/view/2936spa
dc.subjectPsicometríaspa
dc.subjectEscalasspa
dc.subjectReproducibilidad de resultadosspa
dc.subjectRevisiónspa
dc.subjectPsychometricseng
dc.subjectScaleseng
dc.subjectReproducibility of resultseng
dc.subjectRevieweng
dc.titleTécnicas para estimar la estabilidad de una escala de medición en salud.spa
dc.title.translatedTechniques to estimate the stability of a health measuring scale.eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Ciencias Biomédicas - Portal de Revistas

Datos de Contacto

Imagen Escudo Universidad de Cartagena

 

 

 

Sede: Claustro de San Agustín, Centro Histórico, Calle de la Universidad Cra. 6 #36-100
Colombia, Bolívar, Cartagena
Ver más...

Línea de Atención

Línea Anticorrupción

Síguenos en: