Publicación:
Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda Guerrero, Carolinaspa
dc.contributor.authorDe la Hoz Restrepo, Fernandospa
dc.contributor.authorAlvis Guzmán, Nelsonspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583
dc.identifier.eissn2463-0470
dc.identifier.issn0122-8900
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11227/13846
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/download/2583/2161
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 3 , Año 2019spa
dc.relation.citationendpage597
dc.relation.citationissue3spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage581
dc.relation.citationvolume27spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPanorama Económicospa
dc.relation.referencesAdarkwah, C. C., van Gils, P. F., Hiligsmann, M., & Evers, S. M. (2016). Risk of bias in model-based economic evaluations: the ECOBIAS checklist. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(4), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.1103185 : PMid:26588001spa
dc.relation.referencesAkers J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Baba-Akbari A, Beynon S, Booth A, Burch J, . . . Fonseca T. (2009). Systematic Reviews of Economic EvaluationsSystematic Reviews. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, R. (2010). Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility? Health Econ, 19(3), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1486 : PMid:19378354spa
dc.relation.referencesAtehortua, S., Ceballos, M., Gaviria, C. F., & Mejia, A. (2013). [Quality assessment of economic evaluations in health care in Colombia: a systematic review]. Biomedica, 33(4), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v33i4.1536 : PMid:24652216spa
dc.relation.referencesAtkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P. A., Eccles, M., Falck-Ytter, Y., Flottorp, S., . . . Zaza, S. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328(7454), 1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 : PMid:15205295 PMCid:PMC428525spa
dc.relation.referencesAugustovski, F., García Martí, S., & Pichon-Riviere, A. (2013). Estándares Consolidados de Reporte de Evaluaciones Económicas Sanitarias: Versión en Español de la Lista de Comprobación CHEERS. Value in Health Regional Issues, 2(3), 338-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2013.10.004 : PMid:29702767spa
dc.relation.referencesBorgerson, K. (2009). Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspect Biol Med, 52(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0086 : PMid:19395821spa
dc.relation.referencesBriggs A, C. K., Sculper M,. (2007). Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrouwer, W. B., Culyer, A. J., van Exel, N. J., & Rutten, F. F. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J Health Econ, 27(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003 : PMid:18179835spa
dc.relation.referencesBrunetti, M., Shemilt, I., Pregno, S., Vale, L., Oxman, A. D., Lord, J., . . . Schunemann, H. J. (2013). GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 66(2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012 : PMid:22863410spa
dc.relation.referencesCochrane Website. Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved Marzo 7, 2019, from https://www.cochrane.org/about-usspa
dc.relation.referencesCooper, N., Coyle, D., Abrams, K., Mugford, M., & Sutton, A. (2005). Use of evidence in decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581905774414187 : PMid:16259692spa
dc.relation.referencesChaikledkaew, U., & Kittrongsiri, K. (2014). Quality assessment of health economic evaluation. J Med Assoc Thai, 97 Suppl 5, S113-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrummond, M., Barbieri, M., Cook, J., Glick, H. A., Lis, J., Malik, F., . . . Severens, J. (2009). Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health, 12(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00489.x : PMid:19900249spa
dc.relation.referencesDrummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996). Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ, 313(7052), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 : PMid:8704542 PMCid:PMC2351717.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrummond MF, S. M., Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford - United Kingdom.spa
dc.relation.referencesEunetHTA. (2015). Methods for health economic evaluations - A guideline based on current practices in Europe. Retrieved marzo 23, 2019, from https://www.eunethta.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/Methods_for_health_economic_evaluations.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesEvers, S., Goossens, M., de Vet, H., van Tulder, M., & Ament, A. (2005). Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 21(2), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050324 : PMid:15921065spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Fariñas, A., García Rodríguez, J. F., Gálvez González, A. M., & Jimenez López, G. (2016). Calidad metodológica de las evaluaciones económicas completas, publicadas en revistas médicas cubanas (1999-2014). Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 42, 183-192.spa
dc.relation.referencesGomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2014). The Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Evidence.: The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesGomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 13(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063 : PMid:26288063spa
dc.relation.referencesGray, A. M. C., P.M.; Wolstenholme, J.L.; Wordsworth S. (2011). Applied Methods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health Care. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHerner, M. (2019). Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project. BMJ Evid Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111141 : PMid:30842066spa
dc.relation.referencesHiggins, J., & Green, S. (Producer). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesHowick, J., Chalmers, L., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., . . . Hodgkinson, M. (2011). The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Retrieved Marzo 12, 2019, from https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653spa
dc.relation.referencesHusereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., . . . Loder, E. (2013). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-- explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health, 16(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 : PMid:23538175spa
dc.relation.referencesINHATA. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved Marzo 5, 2019, from http://www.inahta.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesISPOR. (2018). Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around the World. Retrieved Marzo 18, 2019 from https://tools.ispor.org/peguidelines/spa
dc.relation.referencesLanger, A. (2012). A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments. BMC Health Serv Res, 12, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-253 : PMid:22894708 PMCid:PMC3507835spa
dc.relation.referencesLiberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Plos Med, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 : PMid:19621070 PMCid:PMC2707010spa
dc.relation.referencesLuhnen, M., Prediger, B., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Mathes, T. (2019). Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1342 : PMid:30761762spa
dc.relation.referencesManterola, C., Asenjo-Lobos, C., & Otzen, T. (2014). [Hierarchy of evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation from current use]. Rev Chilena Infectol, 31(6), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182014000600011 : PMid:25679928spa
dc.relation.referencesMathes, T., Walgenbach, M., Antoine, S. L., Pieper, D., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature. Med Decis Making, 34(7), 826-840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526470 : PMid:24713694spa
dc.relation.referencesMurad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. 21(4), 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 : PMid:27339128 PMCid:PMC4975798spa
dc.relation.referencesNg, Y. K. (2004). Welfare Economics: Towards a More complete Analysis. New York - USA: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403944061spa
dc.relation.referencesPAHO, T. V. (Producer). (2017, Marzo 20 de 2019). Webinar Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE1N35d5mEwspa
dc.relation.referencesPhilips, Z., Ginnelly, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S., Riemsma, R., . . . Glanville, J. (2004). Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess, 8(36), iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8360 : PMid:15361314spa
dc.relation.referencesPichon-Riviere, A., Augustovski, F., Garcia Marti, S., Sullivan, S. D., & Drummond, M. (2012). Transferability of health technology assessment reports in Latin America: an exploratory survey of researchers and decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 28(2), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000074 : PMid:22559762spa
dc.relation.referencesPieper, D., Koensgen, N., Breuing, J., Ge, L., & Wegewitz, U. (2018). How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol, 18(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0520-z : PMid:29914386 PMCid:PMC6006845spa
dc.relation.referencesPollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Featherstone, R., & Hartling, L. (2016). What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Syst Rev, 5(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5 : PMid:27842604 PMCid:PMC5109841spa
dc.relation.referencesPollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., & Hartling, L. (2017). Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 17(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5 : PMid:28335734 PMCid:PMC5364717spa
dc.relation.referencesRedETSA (Producer). (2017, Marzo 18 2019). Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from http://redetsa.org/wp/?p=3994spa
dc.relation.referencesRehfuess, E. A., Stratil, J. M., Scheel, I. B., Portela, A., Norris, S. L., & Baltussen, R. (2019). The WHOINTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Glob Health, 4(Suppl 1), e000844. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844 : PMid:30775012 PMCid:PMC6350705spa
dc.relation.referencesRezapour, A., Jafari, A., Mirmasoudi, K., & Talebianpour, H. (2017). Quality Assessment of Published Articles in Iranian Journals Related to Economic Evaluation in Health Care Programs Based on Drummond's Checklist: A Narrative Review. Iran J Med Sci, 42(5), 427-436.spa
dc.relation.referencesSackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 : PMid:8555924 PMCid:PMC2349778spa
dc.relation.referencesShea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., . . . Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 : PMid:17302989 PMCid:PMC1810543spa
dc.relation.referencesShea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., . . . Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 62(10), 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 : PMid:19230606spa
dc.relation.referencesShea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., . . . Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 : PMid:28935701 PMCid:PMC5833365spa
dc.relation.referencesShemilt, I., McDaid, D., Marsh, K., Henderson, C., Bertranou, E., Mallander, J., . . . Vale, L. (2013). Issues in the incorporation of economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev, 2, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-83 : PMid:24050504 PMCid:PMC3849717spa
dc.relation.referencesSIGN, G. (2011). SIGN 50 A guideline developer's handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network SIGN Retrieved from https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2011.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 : PMid:21291558 PMCid:PMC3039637spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto-Alvarez, J. (2012). Evaluación económica de medicamentos y tecnologías sanitarias: Principios, métodos y aplicaciones en política sanitaria. (S. A. U. Springer SBM Spain Ed.). Madrid, España. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-940346-6-4 : PMid:23513484spa
dc.relation.referencesTan-Torres, E., Baltusen, R., Adam, T., Hutubessy, R., Acharya, A., Evans, D., & Murray, C. J. L. (2003). Making choices in health: WHO Guide to Cost-effectiveness Analysis. from https://www.who.int/choice/publications/p_2003_generalised_cea.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesThielen, F. W., Van Mastrigt, G., Burgers, L. T., Bramer, W. M., Majoie, H., Evers, S., & Kleijnen, J. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 705-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246962 : PMid:27805466spa
dc.relation.referencesThulliez, M., Angoulvant, D., Pisella, P. J., & Bejan-Angoulvant, T. (2018). Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Systemic Adverse Events Associated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Medication Use. JAMA Ophthalmol, 136(5), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0002 : PMid:29566105spa
dc.relation.referencesUrrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). [PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses]. Med Clin (Barc), 135(11), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 : PMid:20206945spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Mastrigt, G. A., Hiligsmann, M., Arts, J. J., Broos, P. H., Kleijnen, J., Evers, S. M., & Majoie, M. H. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246960 : PMid:27805469spa
dc.relation.referencesWalker, D. G., Wilson, R. F., Sharma, R., Bridges, J., Niessen, L., Bass, E. B., & Frick, K. (2012). Best Practices for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care: A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Tools: The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center.spa
dc.relation.referencesWHO, W. H. O. (2008). WHO guide for standardization of economic evaluations of immunization programmes (V. a. B. Department of Immunization, Trans.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.spa
dc.relation.referencesWijnen, B., Van Mastrigt, G., Redekop, W. K., Majoie, H., De Kinderen, R., & Evers, S. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961 : PMid:27762640spa
dc.rightsPanorama Económico - 2019spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2583spa
dc.subjectHealth technologieseng
dc.subjectSystematic revieweng
dc.subjectEconomic evaluationeng
dc.subjectQualityeng
dc.subjectQuality assessmenteng
dc.subjectTecnologías sanitariasspa
dc.subjectTecnologías en saludspa
dc.subjectRevisiones sistemáticasspa
dc.subjectEvaluaciones económicasspa
dc.subjectCalidadspa
dc.subjectEvaluación calidadspa
dc.subjectTechnologies de la santéspa
dc.subjectRevue systématiquespa
dc.subjectÉvaluation économiquespa
dc.subjectQualitéspa
dc.subjectÉvaluation qualitéspa
dc.titleCalidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.spa
dc.title.translatedQuality in systematic reviews of economic evaluations of health technologies.eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Panorama Económico - Portal de Revistas

Datos de Contacto

Imagen Escudo Universidad de Cartagena

 

 

 

Sede: Claustro de San Agustín, Centro Histórico, Calle de la Universidad Cra. 6 #36-100
Colombia, Bolívar, Cartagena
Ver más...

Línea de Atención

Línea Anticorrupción

Síguenos en: