Publicación:
Modelo de desarrollo lingüístico secuencial en L2 (PFIAP): potenciando el aprendizaje efectivo de una L2

dc.contributor.authorLuchini, Pedrospa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T15:39:57Z
dc.date.available2024-09-21T15:39:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-21
dc.description.abstractEste artículo presenta un modelo integral y progresivo de desarrollo lingüístico, concebido para facilitar el aprendizaje efectivo de una segunda lengua o lengua extranjera (L2). Este modelo se basa en teorías educativas como el enfoque por tareas, la teoría de la metacognición y la lingüística cognitiva, y tiene como propósito fomentar la participación, la reflexión metacognitiva, la utilización de diversas estrategias de aprendizaje y la aplicación práctica de habilidades lingüísticas en situaciones reales. Estructurado en cinco etapas: Percepción, Focalización, Internalización, Aplicación y Producción (PFIAP), cada una complementada con actividades sugeridas, ofrece una visión concreta de su aplicación. Para demostrar su efectividad, se presentan los resultados de una prueba piloto realizada en un colegio secundario privado en Mar del Plata, donde tres docentes participaron en un grupo focal para evaluar la efectividad del modelo. Los comentarios obtenidos reflejaron tanto los beneficios como los desafíos de su implementación. A partir de estos datos, se destacan algunas implicaciones pedagógicas que subrayan la importancia de adoptar enfoques didácticos dinámicos y centrados en los estudiantes para mejorar el aprendizaje en el aula. Además, se identifican algunas limitaciones y desafíos potenciales en su aplicación. Se sugiere que, con adaptación y revisión continua, este enfoque podría convertirse en una valiosa herramienta pedagógica para la enseñanza de lenguas segundas o extranjeras.spa
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a comprehensive and progressive model of linguistic development, conceived to facilitate the effective learning of a second or foreign language (L2). This model is based on educational theories such as task-based learning, metacognition theory, and cognitive linguistics, aiming to promote active participation, metacognitive reflection, the use of diverse learning strategies, and the practical application of language skills in real-life situations. Structured into five litstages: Perception, Focus, Internalization, Application, and Production (PFIAP), each complemented with suggested activities, it offers a concrete view of its application. To  demonstrate  its effectiveness, the results of a pilot test conducted at a private secondary school in Mar del Plata are presented, where three teachers participated in a focus group to evaluate the effectiveness of the model. The collected feedback reflected both the benefits and challenges of its implementation. Based on these data, some pedagogical implications were highlighted, emphasizing the importance of adopting dynamic and student-centered teaching approaches to enhance learning in the classroom. Additionally, some limitations and potential challenges in its application were identified. It is suggested that, with continuous adaptation and review, this approach could become a valuable pedagogical tool for teaching second or foreign languages.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/RVP-vol.18-num.2-2024-4865
dc.identifier.eissn2619-4023
dc.identifier.issn2248-485X
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/RVP-vol.18-num.2-2024-4865
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/visitasalpatio/article/download/4865/3768
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/visitasalpatio/article/download/4865/3769
dc.relation.citationendpage256
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage242
dc.relation.citationvolume18spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalVisitas al Patiospa
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x.spa
dc.relation.referencesBialystok, D. M. (1990). Metacognition in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(3), 273-291.spa
dc.relation.referencesBjork, R. A. (1988). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. En Metcalfe, J. y Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. En Gopher, D. y Koriat, A. (Eds.). Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435-459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. En Spiro, R., Bruce, B. y Brewer, W. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp.453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. En Weinert, F. E., y Kluwe, R. H. (Eds.). Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesCondemarín, M., Galdames, V. y Medina, A. (1995). Taller de lenguaje. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Dolmen.spa
dc.relation.referencesCook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesDjigunovic, J. M. (2001). Beyond language learning strategies: A look at the affective link. Studia Romanica Et Anglica Zagrabiensia (SRAZ), XLV-XL, 1, 11-23. https://core.ac.uk/reader/19891860spa
dc.relation.referencesDjigunović, J.M. (2000). Beyond language learning strategies: A look at the affective link.spa
dc.relation.referencesEfklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2003). Task-Based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2017). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. En DeKeyser, R. M. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 190-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, V. (2009). How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J.H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesGass, S. M. y Selinker, L. (Eds.). (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLangacker, R. (2000). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.spa
dc.relation.referencesLangacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLantolf, J. P. y Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeow, R. P. y Cai, G. (2015). Individual differences, attention, and awareness in language learning. En Rebuschat, P. (Ed.). Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 143-165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition Theory. En Gass, S. y Madden, C. (Eds.). Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. H. (1996). Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. H. (2007). Methodological issues in the study of learner-learner interaction. En Mackey, A. (Ed.). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 349-377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLyster, R. y Ranta, L. (2013). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167-179.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackey, A. y Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design. Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMosley, P. (2017). Metacognition in the adult beginner. Cham: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesNelson, T. O. y Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? En Metcalfe, J. y Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorris, J. M. y Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and qualitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. (2017). Applied linguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. y Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). (2003). Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPica, T. y Doughty, C. (2016). Learning to learn and teach with collaborative tasks. En Task-based language teaching: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 50-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichard-Amato, P. A. y Snow, M. A. (2015). Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, P., et al (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, P. (2015). Attention and memory in SLA. En Hinkel, E. (Ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning Vol. 2 (pp. 435-451). Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, R. (2019). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. En Han, Z. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and psycholinguistics (pp. 61-78). Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G. y Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumann, J. H. (2017). The neurobiology of learning: Implications for second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSkehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSkehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. En Gass, S. y Madden, C. (Eds.). Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. En Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVanPatten, B. y Williams, J. (Eds.). (2015). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Londres: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. y Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, J. (2012). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(7), 425-439.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A Framework for task-based learning. Londres: Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. y Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. En Boekaerts, M., Pintrich,P. R. y Zeidner, M. (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (2002). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. Nueva York, NY: Springer.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/visitasalpatio/article/view/4865spa
dc.subjectlinguistic developmenteng
dc.subjectL2 teachingeng
dc.subjectcomprehensible approacheng
dc.subjectcognitive and metacognition theorieseng
dc.subjectpedagogyeng
dc.subjectdesarrollo lingüísticospa
dc.subjectenseñanza de L2spa
dc.subjectenfoque integralspa
dc.subjectteorías cognitivas y metacognitivasspa
dc.subjectpedagogíaspa
dc.titleModelo de desarrollo lingüístico secuencial en L2 (PFIAP): potenciando el aprendizaje efectivo de una L2spa
dc.title.translatedSequential Linguistic Development Model in L2 (PFIAP): Enhancing Effective Learning of an L2eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa

Archivos

Datos de Contacto

Imagen Escudo Universidad de Cartagena

 

 

 

Línea de Atención

Línea Anticorrupción

Síguenos en: