Publicación:
Estudio comparativo de bupivacaína al 0,25% vs levobupivacaína al 0,375% en anestesia raquídea para intervencion cesarea.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPérez Guzmán, Carlos Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorMarzan Esquivel, Antonio Joséspa
dc.contributor.authorVargas Moreno, Daniel Franciscospa
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Bermejo, Juan Carlosspa
dc.contributor.authorMontoya Jaramillo, Marcelaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12 22:26:31
dc.date.available2021-07-12 22:26:31
dc.date.issued2021-07-12
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/rcb-2011-3377
dc.identifier.eissn2389-7252
dc.identifier.issn2215-7840
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/rcb-2011-3377
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/download/3377/2863
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2011spa
dc.relation.citationendpage26
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage15
dc.relation.citationvolume2spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ciencias Biomédicasspa
dc.relation.referencesBelizan JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America : ecological study. BMJ 1999; 319(7222) : 1397-1400.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorgia ML, Cristodulu CL, Errico L, Pizzicaroli C, Aragona P. Intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil and morphine for cesarean section. A comparison with racemic bupivacaine. Minerva Anestesiol 2002; 68 (2 Suppl 9) : 146.spa
dc.relation.referencesCelleno D, Parpaglioni R, Frigo M.G, Barbati G. Intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for cesarean section. Minerva Anestesiol 2005;71:521-5spa
dc.relation.referencesChristopher C. Rout, FRCA. Anestesia regional para cesárea. Anestesia Obstétrica de Birnbach, Gatt and Datta. McGrawHill. 2002; 273-298.spa
dc.relation.referencesDyer Robert A; Joubert, I. A. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2004, 17:301–308.spa
dc.relation.referencesNg K, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Anestesia raquídea versus epidural para la cesárea. Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 2008 Número 2. Oxford: Update. http://www.update-software.com.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Wong M, Lee A. Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery; a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 680-685.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Kleef J, Veering B, Burn A. Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a double blind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5 and 0.75% solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 1125-1130.spa
dc.relation.referencesValldeperas M.I, Aguilar J. L. Cefalea post-punción dural en obstetricia: ¿Es realmente una complicación “benigna”? ¿Cómo podemos prevenirla y tratarla eficazmente?. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 2006; 53: 615-617.spa
dc.relation.referencesVelickovic IA, Leicht CH. Walking spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery-have we walked too far? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 113-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoofthooft E, Van de Velde M. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008; 21(3): 259-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Martínez Navas, M. Echevarría Moreno. Et al. Estudio multivariable de factores de riesgo de hipotensión arterial en gestantes a término intervenidas de cesárea bajo anestesia subaracnoidea. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 2000; 47: 189-193.spa
dc.relation.referencesShibli KU, Russell IF. A survey of anaesthetic techniques used for cesarean section in the UK in 1997. Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9:160-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Bernat García, J. Gallego García, A. Abengochea Cotaina. Estudio aleatorio, doble ciego sobre la utilización de diferentes dosis de bupivacaína hiperbara con o sin fentanilo, en cesáreas con anestesia subaracnoidea. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 2007; 54: 4-10spa
dc.relation.referencesBen-David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25(3): 235-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesParpaglioni R, Frigo MG, Lemma A, Sebastiani M, Barbati G, Celleno D. Minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for caesarean section. Anaesth. 2006; 61(2): 110-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhizar-Lugo VM, Martínez NG, Torres JCh. Polémicas en anestesia subaracnoidea. Anestesia en México 2004;16(2):241-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesBergamaschi F, Balle VR, Gomes MEW, Machado SB, Mendes FF - Levobupivacaína Versus Bupivacaína en Anestesia Peridural para Cesáreas. Estudio Comparativo. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2005; 55: 6: 602 – 606spa
dc.relation.referencesBardsley H, Gristwood R. Baker H: A Comparison of the Cardiovascular Effects of Levobupivacaine and Ropicaine following Intravenous Administration to Healthy Volunters. Br J Clin Pharcmacol Sep 1998; 46 : 245 - 249.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubin A : Levobupivacaína ofrece versatilidad y eficacia. V Simposio de Anestesia regional y Manejo del Dolor. Chile 2002: 5- 8.spa
dc.relation.referencesWildsmith JA. New local anaesthetics-how much is improved safety worth? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45; 625-633.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Wong M, Lee A. Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery; a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg 2002;94:680-685.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalinovsky JM, Charles F, Kick O. et al. Intrathecal anesthesia ropivacaine versus bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1957-1960.spa
dc.relation.referencesBustamante S, García A, González P. Guías de manejo en Anestesia. Analgesia y Anestesia para cesárea. Celsus 2006; 455-478.spa
dc.relation.referencesReidy J, Douglas J. Vasopressors in Obstetrics. Anesthesiology Clin 2008; 26 : 75-88spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Vázquez A, Rodríguez–Valdés C, Medina J. Bloqueo simpático: comparación entre bupivacaína isobárica y bupivacaína hiperbárica en anestesia locorregional subaracnoidea. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor, 6: 263-268, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers SA, Gleicher N. A succesful program to lower cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 1511-1516.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavies JM: Obstetric Anesthesia Closed Claims — Trends Over Last Three Decades. ASA Newsletter 68(6): 12-14, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuevara-López U. Fisiopatología y terapéutica del dolor perioperatorio. Revista mexicana de Anestesiología. 2008; 31: suplemento 1; 231-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnestesia raquídea versus anestesia peridural para la cesárea. Revisión Cochrane. The Cochrane Library Número 4, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesNermin K. Girgin et al. Intrathecal morphine in anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-response relationship for combinations of low-dose intrathecal morphine and spinal bupivacaine. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2008: 20, 180–185spa
dc.relation.referencesDuke J. Anesthesia secrets. Regional anesthesia VIII; 2008: 481-488spa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. Disponible en http://www.asra.comspa
dc.relation.referencesNagata E, Yoshimine K, Minoda Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sakamoto M, Takehara A. Comparision of 8 mg and 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in Japanese parturient. Masui. 2004; 53(2):131-6.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/view/3377spa
dc.subjectcesarean section anesthesiaeng
dc.subjectbupivacaineeng
dc.subjectlevobupivacaineeng
dc.subjectarterial hypotensioneng
dc.subjectanestesia maternaspa
dc.subjectdilución bupivacaínaspa
dc.subjectdilución levobupivacaínaspa
dc.subjecthipotensión maternaspa
dc.titleEstudio comparativo de bupivacaína al 0,25% vs levobupivacaína al 0,375% en anestesia raquídea para intervencion cesarea.spa
dc.title.translatedComparative study of bupivacaine 0.25% vs 0.375% levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Ciencias Biomédicas - Portal de Revistas

Datos de Contacto

Imagen Escudo Universidad de Cartagena

 

 

 

Sede: Claustro de San Agustín, Centro Histórico, Calle de la Universidad Cra. 6 #36-100
Colombia, Bolívar, Cartagena
Ver más...

Línea de Atención

Línea Anticorrupción

Síguenos en: