Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGallo Roa, Robertospa
dc.contributor.authorAriza Alvis, Anggie Tatianaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15 00:00:00
dc.date.available2021-04-15 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2021-04-15
dc.identifier.issn2215-7840
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ciencias Biomédicasspa
dc.rightsAnggie Tatiana Ariza Alvis - 2021spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/view/3373spa
dc.subjectCervical cerclageeng
dc.subjectPremature birtheng
dc.subjectCerclaje cervicalspa
dc.subjectTrabajo de parto prematurospa
dc.titleIndicaciones para la realización de cerclaje profiláctico en la prevención de parto pretérmino del embarazo de feto único.spa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.title.translatedIndications to perform a prophylactic cerclage to prevent preterm delivery of single fetus pregnancy.eng
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/rcb-2021-3373
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.identifier.eissn2389-7252
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/rcb-2021-3373
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/download/3373/2859
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2021spa
dc.relation.citationendpage135
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage129
dc.relation.citationvolume10spa
dc.relation.referencesAbenhaim H, Tulandi T. Cervical insufficiency: Re-evaluating the prophylactic cervical cerclage. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2009; 22(6): 510-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050902794733spa
dc.relation.referencesOwen J, Hankins G, Iams J, Berghella V, Sheffield J, Perez-Delboy A et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 201(4): 375.e1-375.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.015spa
dc.relation.referencesAkladios C, Sananes N, Gaudineau A, Boudier E, Langer B. Le cerclage cervical. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2015; 44(8): 771-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.06.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: Can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 194(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.002spa
dc.relation.referencesTo M, Alfirevic Z, Heath V, Cicero S, Cacho A, Williamson P et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in woman with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2004; 363(9424): 1849-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16351-4spa
dc.relation.referencesAlthuisius S, Dekker G, van Geijn H, Bekedam D, Hummel P. Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Study design and preliminary results. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000; 183(4): 823-829. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.108874spa
dc.relation.referencesSakai M, Shiozaki A, Tabata M, Sasaki Y, Yoneda S, Arai T et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of prophylactic cerclage of a short cervix according to interleukin-8 in cervical mucus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 194(1): 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.014spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzman E, Forster J, Vintzileos A, Ananth C, Walters C, Gipson K. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998; 12(5): 323-327. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050323.xspa
dc.relation.referencesTo M, Palaniappan V, Skentou C, Gibb D, Nicolaides K. Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002; 19(5): 475-477. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00673.xspa
dc.relation.referencesHiggins S, Kornman L, Bell R, Brennecke S. Cervical surveillance as an alternative to elective cervical cerclage for pregnancy management of suspected cervical incompetence. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004; 44(3): 228-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00220.xspa
dc.relation.referencesMacnaughton M, Chalmers I, Dubowitz V, Dunn P, Grant A, McPherson K et al. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsMulticentreRandomised Trial of Cervical Cerclage. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1993; 100(6): 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.xspa
dc.relation.referencesDrakeley A. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003; 102(3): 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200309000-00035spa
dc.relation.referencesDrakeley A, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003253spa
dc.relation.referencesAlfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3spa
dc.relation.referencesBerghella V, Saccone G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub4spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas I. P, Vera P-G. C, Carvajal C. J. Cerclaje para la prevención de embarazo de pretérmino en mujeres con cérvix corto encontrado en ecografía transvaginal: un estudio randomizado. Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología. 2004;69(6). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262004000600014spa
dc.relation.referencesMarcellin L. Prévention de l'accouchement prématuré par cerclage du col de l'utérus. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2016;45(10):1299-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.022spa
dc.relation.referencesHedriana H, Lanouette J, Haesslein H, McLean L. Is there value for serial ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lengths after a cerclage?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008; 198(6): 705.e1-705.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.033spa
dc.relation.referencesRust O, Atlas R, Reed J, van Gaalen J, Balducci J. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: Why cerclage therapy may not help. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001; 185(5): 1098-1105. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.118163spa
dc.relation.referencesScheib S, Visintine JF, Miroshnichenko G, Harvey C, Rychlak K, Berghella V. Is cerclage height associated with the incidence of preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cer-clage? Am J ObstetGynecol 2009; 200: e12-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.021spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller E, Gerber S. Association Between Sonographic Cervical Appearance and Preterm Delivery After a History-Indicated Cerclage. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014; 33(12): 2181-2186. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.12.2181spa
dc.relation.referencesSim S, Da Silva Costa F, Araujo Júnior E, Sheehan P. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth risk assessed by transvaginal ultrasound following cervical cerclage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015; 55(4): 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12361spa
dc.relation.referencesBerghella V, Keeler S, To M, Althuisius S, Rust O. Effectiveness of cerclage according to severity of cervical length shortening: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 35(4): 468-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7547spa
dc.relation.referencesOwen J, Mancuso M. Cervical Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2012; 39(1): 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2011.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBerghella V, Mackeen A. Cervical Length Screening with Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage Compared with History-Indicated Cerclage for Prevention of Preterm Birth. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011; 118(1): 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd5b0spa
dc.relation.referencesKagan K, To M, Tsoi E, Nicolaides K. Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2006; 113: 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01124.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCook J, Chatfield S, Chandiramani M, Kindinger L, Cacciatore S, Sykes L et al. Cerclage position, cervical length and preterm delivery in women undergoing ultrasound indicated cervical cerclage: A retrospective cohort study. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12(6): e0178072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178072spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Rev Cienc Biomed-3373.pdf23.45Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Anggie Tatiana Ariza Alvis - 2021
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Anggie Tatiana Ariza Alvis - 2021