Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMontes-Farah, Juan Manuelspa
dc.contributor.authorOjeda-Rodríguez, Kelman Hanaelspa
dc.contributor.authorSegovia-Fuentes, Javier Ignaciospa
dc.contributor.authorHenao-Castrillón, Julio Césarspa
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-15 00:00:00
dc.date.available2013-01-15 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2013-01-15
dc.identifier.issn2215-7840
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11227/12946
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Cartagenaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ciencias Biomédicasspa
dc.rightsRevista Ciencias Biomédicas - 2020spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/view/2760spa
dc.subjectNódulo pulmonar solitariospa
dc.subjectNeoplasias pulmonaresspa
dc.subjectDiagnósticospa
dc.subjectTratamientospa
dc.subjectspa
dc.titleNódulo pulmonar solitario: enfoque, diagnóstico y tratamientospa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.title.translatedNódulo pulmonar solitario: enfoque, diagnóstico y tratamientoeng
dc.identifier.doi10.32997/rcb-2013-2760
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.identifier.eissn2389-7252
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32997/rcb-2013-2760
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/cbiomedicas/article/download/2760/2309
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2013spa
dc.relation.citationendpage233
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage225
dc.relation.citationvolume4spa
dc.relation.referencesOst D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(25): 2535-2542.spa
dc.relation.referencesGould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, Lynch WR, Midthun DE, Naidich PD, et al. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: When is it lung cancer?:ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007; 132(3 Suppl): 108S-130S.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlbert RH, Russell JJ. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 80(8): 827-831.spa
dc.relation.referencesThiessen NR, Bremner R. The solitary pulmonary nodule: approach for general surgeon. Surg Clin N Am. 2010;90(5):1003-1018.spa
dc.relation.referencesTan BB, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2003;123 (1 Suppl): 89S - 96S.spa
dc.relation.referencesJemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics 2010. Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60(5):277- 300.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiñeros M, Murillo RH. Incidencia de cáncer en Colombia: importancia de las fuentes de información en la obtención de cifras estimativas. Rev. Colomb. Cancerol. 2004; 8(1):5-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesCamacho F. Nódulo solitario del pulmón. Rev Neumol Col.2001; 12(3): 138-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuménigo O, De Armas B, Gil A, Gordis MV. Nódulo pulmonar solitario: ¿Qué hacer? Rev Cubana Cir.2007;46(2).Disponible en: http://www.imbiomed.com.mx/1/1/articulos.php?id_revista=57&id_ejemplar=4869. [Accedido: Enero-25-2013].spa
dc.relation.referencesJeon YJ, Yi CA, Lee KS.Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection, characterization, and guidance for further diagnostic workup and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(1):57-68.spa
dc.relation.referencesZwirewich CV, Vedal S, Miller RR, Müller NL. Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1991; 179(2):469-476.spa
dc.relation.referencesGurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodulaes with Bayesian analysis. Par I. Theory. Radiology. 1993;186(2):405-413.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Sloan JA, Sykes AM et al. Lung cancer screening with CT, Mayo clinic experience. Radiology. 2003;226 (3):756-761.spa
dc.relation.referencesHennschke CL, Yannkelvitz DF, Naidith JP, McCauley DI, McGuinness G, Libby DM, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology. 2004: 231(1): 164-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesErasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP, Roggli VL. Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Part I. Morphologic Evaluation for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions. Radiographics. 2000; 20(1): 43-58.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartman TE. Radiographic evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43(3):459-465.spa
dc.relation.referencesViggiano RW, Swensen SJ, Rosenow EC 3rd. Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med. 1992;13(1):83-95.spa
dc.relation.referencesLillington GA, Caskey CI. Evaluation and management of solitary multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med. 1993;14 (1):111-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiner-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD,Aisen AM, Tann M, Conces DJ et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology. 2002; 223 (3):798-805.spa
dc.relation.referencesErasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP, Roggli VL. Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Part II. Evaluation of the Indeterminate Nodule. Radiographics. 2000;20 (1):59-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesKo JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, Babb JS, Betke M, McGuinness G, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology. 2003; 228(3):864-870.spa
dc.relation.referencesSiegelman SS, Khouri NF, Leo FP, Fishman EK, Braverman RM, Zerhouni EA. Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment. Radiology. 1986;160 (2):307-312.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenschkle Cl, Yankelvitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part solid and nonsolid nodules. AJRl. 2002; 178(5): 1053-1057.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuzuki K, Asamura et al. “Early” peripheral lung cancer: prognostic significance of ground glass opacity on thin-section computed tomographic scan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74 (5):1635-1639.spa
dc.relation.referencesTheros EG. 1976 Caldwell lecture: varying manifestations of peripheral pulmonary neoplasms: a radiologic-pathologic correlative study. AJR. 1977;128(6):893-914.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoodring JH, Fried AM. Significance of wall thickness in solitary cavities of the lung: a follow-up study. AJR. 1983;140(3):473-474.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoodring JH, Fried AM, Chuang VP. Solitary cavities of the lung: diagnostic implications of cavity wall thickness. AJR. 1980; 135(6): 1269-1271.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL, Midthun DE. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology. 1996; 201 (2): 447-455.spa
dc.relation.referencesYamashita K, Matsunobe S, Tsuda T,Nemoto T, Matsumoto K, Miki H, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology. 1995;194(2):399-405.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatz EF, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, Paine SS, Burrowes P, Coleman RE,et al. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology. 1993; 188 (2):487- 490.spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta NC, Maloof J, Gunel E. Probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules using fluorine-18-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37(6): 943- 948.spa
dc.relation.referencesHübner KF, Buonocore E, Gould HR, Thie J, Smith GT, Stephens S et al. Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using “quantitative” parameters of FDG PET images. Clin Nucl Med. 1996;21(12):941-949.spa
dc.relation.referencesCappabianca S, Porto A, Petrillo M, Greco B, Reginelli A, Ronza F et al. Preliminary study on the correlation between grading and histology of solitary pulmonary nodules and contrast enhancement and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose standardised uptake value after evaluation by dynamic multiphase CT and PET/CT. J Clin Pathol. 2011; 64(2): 114-119.spa
dc.relation.referencesEisenberg RL, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM. Compliance with Fleischner society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologist. Radiology. 2010; 255(1):218-224.spa
dc.relation.referencesDewan NA, Shehan CJ, Reeb SD, Gobar LS, Scott WJ, Ryschon K. Likelihood of malignancy in a solitary pulmonary nodule: comparison of Bayesian analysis and results of FDG-PET scan. Chest. 1997;112(2):416-422.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Midthun DE, Mandrekar JN. 5-year lung cancer screening experience: growth curves of 18 lung cancers compared to histologic type, CT attenuation, stage, survival, and size. Chest. 2009; 136(6):1586-1595.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlack WC, Armstrong P. Communicating the significance of radiologic test results: the likelihood ratio. AJR. 1986;147(6):1313-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesOst D, Fein A. Management strategies for the solitary pulmonary nodule. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004;10(4):272-278.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Tassel D, Van Tassel L, Gotway M, Korn R. Imaging evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. ClinPulm Med. 2011;18(6):274-299.spa
dc.relation.referencesCronin P, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Carlos RC. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. Radiology. 2008; 246 (3):772-782.spa
dc.relation.referencesRhee CK, Kang HH, Kang JY, Kim JW, Kim YH, et al. Diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy without fluoroscopic guidance in evaluating peripheral lung lesions. J Bronchol Intervent Pulmonol. 2010;17:317-322.spa
dc.relation.referencesHergott CA, Tremblay A. Role of bronchoscopy in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med. 2010;31(1):49-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesEberhardt R, Kahn N, Gompelmann D, Schumann M, Heussel CP, Herth FJ. Lung Point-a new approach to peripheral lesions. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(10):1559-1563.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-Analysis of guided bronchoscopy for evaluation of the pulmonary nodule.Chest. 2012; 142(2):385-393spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan I, Chin R, Adair N, Chatterjee A, Haponik E, et al. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. Clin Pulm Med. 2011;18:42-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlein JS, Braff S. Imaging evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(1):15-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlum M, De Hoyos A. Surgical approach to the small detected lung nodule. Clin Pulm Med. 2010;17:129-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesTamura M, Oda M, Fujimori H, Shimizu Y, Matsumoto I, Watanabe G. New indication for preoperative marking of small peripheral pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic surgery. Interact CardiovascThorac Surg. 2010;11(5):590-593.spa
dc.relation.referencesPompeo E, Mineo D, Rogliani P, Sabato AF, Mineo TC, Steinglass K, et al. Feasibility and results of awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 78(5):1761-1768.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen S, Zhou J, Zhang J, Hong Hu, Luo X, Zhang Y, Chen H. Video-assisted thoracoscopic solitary pulmonary nodule resection after CT-guided hookwire localization: 43 cases report and literature review. Sur Endosc. 2011; 25:1723-29.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Rev Cienc Biomed-2760.pdf23.45Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Revista Ciencias Biomédicas - 2020
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Revista Ciencias Biomédicas - 2020